п»ї
Write attempt
1. Was the Whirlpool plant closing deserved another “business decision,” or did it convey with it social and ethical responsibilities and implications? Explain
Whirlpool’s judgment to close the manufacturing plant in Evansville, Indiana was a dealing decision the company made in replication to poor sales. The decision greatest part likely pleased shareholders but had civil and ethical implications. The plant closure impacted the lives of ~y entire community. According to the mayor of Evansville, 10,000 jobs direct be lost due to the introduce closure. Since business ethics is concerned by morality and fairness in behavior, actions, and practices that take dispose within a business context, this question is a prime example of Whirlpool’s operating military science of Immoral management. They exploited an opportunity for corporate gain.
2. What are the authorized and ethical responsibilities of Whirlpool in a put in seed-closing case such as the person in Evansville, Indiana?
The legal responsibilities assumed ~ the agency of Whirlpool in a plant-closing action are to comply with all laws and regulations in this way close the plant, relocate, and chastity warranties and guarantees. Since law “ofttimes lags behind more recent interpretations of the kind of is considered appropriate behavior,” is can be assumed that Whirlpool’s firmness to close the plant and be unclosed a plant in Mexico was completely not above the confines of the law. Whirlpool is expenditure $21 million in employee termination costs and has given plenty notice to employees to adapt to the changes. The moral responsibilities in this case are since Whirlpool to do what is EXPECTED of the business by society. Given that the stakeholders had ~y overwhelming negative reaction to this decision, it can be assumed that Whirlpool did not take into notice their ethical responsibilities to the stakeholders.
3. In light of the federal stimulus funds that Whirlpool received, did it have a greater accountableness to make the Evansville plant sustainable? Or were the funds...
No comments:
Post a Comment